|
|
Subscribe to our Weekly Digest
Sign up here to receive the best of the Media Hub. We hand-pick the most insightful commentary and coverage every week and deliver it in an easy-to-read HTML format.
Corante Media Hub
The Corante Media Hub is your starting point for keeping abreast of the best writing and thinking on media across the blogosphere and beyond. Here you'll find the field's most insightful observers and commentators tracking and reporting on its latest developments as well as weighing in on its future. For a full description of the Media Hub and the Corante Network in general, visit this page.
Click here for a full list of the Media Hub contributors. We encourage you to provide ideas and suggestions as we work to make this hub and the extended network ever more useful - email us at hubfeedback@gmail.com.
Corante Media Network Members
Editorial Archives
Media Network Archives
|
1. Al on July 7, 2006 11:47 PM writes...
I agree totally. The Times should be printing these secrets. And for those that say "everyone knew about these financial programs", a few points:
- The NY Times does not decide what is confidential or not confidential. Freedom of the press does not release them from responsibility.
- One of the authors of the article had a previous article in Nov of 2005 and had quite a few different things to say. So with all of the resources of the Times, he was unable to uncover this nine months ago. So it doesn't look like "everyone knew."
- I understand that Belgium is reviewing this SWIFT program or it's involvement as a result of the article.
I wonder if this program helped us track the latest terrorist plots? ...and which terrorist action will succeed because of being hampered by this disclosure? In other words, how many people will die because of the arrogance of the Times?
Who benefited from the disclosure? Certainly not the country.
Permalink to Comment2. Martin on July 8, 2006 12:21 PM writes...
I think we who love our country, and the founding ideas on which it was build, (i.e. the declaration of independence, the constitution and the protections our founding fathers build in to the “government) benefited from the New York Times article.
It is the job of a free press to question a program that may be in violition of international treaties or even our own laws (even if Congress now votes that the swift program was legal). A healthy debate about this type of issue is what this country was all about. President George W. Bush attack singling out the New York Times smacks of a fascist tactic to keep people in fear so as to control any oposition to his efforts.
I personally think this article did not harm are security. It seems to be an effort to now direct attention to the article and its publisher and a cleverly maniputate discussion from what the article was about and redirect it to The New York Times by attacking them. What arrogance!
Thank god for the recent restraint of this president’s arrogant grab for power by The Supreme Court. It seems we still may have an independent court dispite attemps to stack the court judges who’s policial views are similar to George W’s.
Permalink to Comment3. Jason on July 12, 2006 08:46 PM writes...
I find it difficult to believe that the disclosure of financial monitoring will cost lives. The tracking of criminal assets and transactions is hardly news.
The only issue at hand is that George W. Bush has been given the opportunity to take down a vital press outlet that is not ideologically in his thrall.
If the New York Times faces any sort of prosecution for discussing a process, then George W. should be impeached for his "loose lips" in the Valerie Plame affair.
If the New York Times loses this latest battle, the Administration's war will retreat into the background. Without the press and courts occasionally reminding them that they've gone too far, we will continue to be the victims of the overzealousness and incompetence of the Administration with less recourse in the neverending war.
Permalink to Comment